🔗 Share this article

One of the most famous pictures from the 20th century portrays an unclothed young girl, her limbs spread wide, her face distorted in pain, her body burned and raw. She can be seen running toward the camera while escaping a bombing during the Vietnam War. Beside her, youngsters are fleeing out of the bombed village in Trảng Bàng, amid a backdrop of dark smoke and the presence of military personnel.

This International Effect from a Powerful Picture

Shortly after its publication in June 1972, this photograph—originally titled "Napalm Girl"—evolved into a traditional phenomenon. Witnessed and discussed by countless people, it has been widely attributed with energizing worldwide views opposing the US war in Vietnam. An influential author subsequently observed that the profoundly indelible picture featuring nine-year-old the girl suffering possibly did more to fuel public revulsion toward the conflict than lengthy broadcasts of broadcast violence. A renowned British photojournalist who reported on the conflict labeled it the single best image from what became known as the televised conflict. A different seasoned photojournalist stated how the photograph is simply put, a pivotal photographs ever made, particularly from that conflict.

A Decades-Long Attribution Followed by a New Allegation

For over five decades, the image was attributed to the work of Huynh Cong “Nick” Út, an emerging local photojournalist employed by the Associated Press in Saigon. Yet a disputed recent documentary on a popular platform argues which states the iconic picture—long considered as the peak of photojournalism—was actually shot by a different man on the scene during the attack.

According to the film, The Terror of War was in fact taken by a freelancer, who offered his photos to the organization. The allegation, along with the documentary's subsequent investigation, stems from a man named a former photo editor, who claims how a influential bureau head directed the staff to alter the photograph's attribution from the freelancer to Út, the one AP staff photographer present that day.

The Search for the Real Story

The former editor, now in his 80s, emailed one of the journalists in 2022, seeking support to identify the unnamed photographer. He stated how, if he could be found, he wanted to give a regret. The investigator thought of the independent photographers he worked with—likening them to current independents, just as local photographers during the war, are routinely ignored. Their efforts is commonly doubted, and they function amid more challenging conditions. They lack insurance, no retirement plans, little backing, they frequently lack proper gear, and they are highly exposed when documenting within their homeland.

The investigator pondered: Imagine the experience to be the man who made this iconic picture, should it be true that he was not the author?” From a photographic perspective, he thought, it would be extraordinarily painful. As a student of war photography, specifically the celebrated documentation of the era, it might be earth-shattering, perhaps legacy-altering. The respected history of the image among the diaspora was so strong that the creator who had family emigrated during the war was reluctant to pursue the investigation. He expressed, I was unwilling to challenge this long-held narrative that credited Nick the image. Nor did I wish to change the status quo among a group that always looked up to this achievement.”

The Investigation Develops

Yet the two the filmmaker and his collaborator agreed: it was worth raising the issue. “If journalists must keep the world responsible,” remarked the investigator, “we have to are willing to ask difficult questions of ourselves.”

The documentary follows the journalists in their pursuit of their research, including testimonies from observers, to call-outs in today's Ho Chi Minh City, to reviewing records from additional films captured during the incident. Their work lead to an identity: a driver, working for a news network at the time who sometimes sold photographs to international news outlets on a freelance basis. In the film, an emotional the man, now also elderly and living in the United States, states that he handed over the photograph to the AP for $20 and a copy, but was troubled by not being acknowledged over many years.

This Reaction and Additional Scrutiny

He is portrayed throughout the documentary, quiet and reflective, but his story turned out to be explosive among the field of journalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to